Investments in innovative projects based on universities

Authors

  • Milana G. Uspayeva Chechen State University
  • Akhmed M. Gachaev Grozny State Oil Technical University named after Academician M. D. Millionshchikov, Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25726/w6210-2850-4745-u

Keywords:

Investment, digital, digital technologies, education, management

Abstract

The challenges that the governments of the countries face in building a digital economy are, first of all, the insufficient level of awareness in the specifics of the implementation and practical implementation of the digital development strategy, for the insufficient level of education of employees who lack the necessary skills to work with modern digital technologies. As the study of digital strategies of 35 countries shows, usually the development of a state digital development strategy is carried out by a ministry or body that cannot professionally approach this problem due to the lack of necessary specialists who are knowledgeable in digital technologies. The next serious problem of implementing institutional transformations of the investment component of the digital development strategy is the need to ensure an effective system for coordinating its implementation at all levels – governments, industries, regions, enterprises, etc. It is worth noting that the problem of coordinating digital development and developing a digital strategy is also characteristic of developed countries. In 15 of the 35 OECD countries for which the analysis was conducted, digital development issues are handled by ministries that are not professional; only 8 countries have created a special government structure for the development and implementation of an appropriate strategy; in 6 countries, several ministries and public administration bodies are engaged in the development of a digital strategy for economic development at once  without effective coordination of actions. Only 4 countries – Austria, Luxembourg, Mexico and the Slovak Republic-have appointed a high-level official from the Presidential Administration, the Prime Minister's Office or relevant ministries, who is responsible for coordinating all activities aimed at implementing the national digital development strategy.

References

Виштак О.В. Мотивационные предпочтения абитуриентов и студентов // Социологические исследования. 2003. № 2. С. 135-138.

Дебренн М, Погорельская А.М., Поморина И.В., Скалабан И.А. Сравнительный анализ факторов, определяющих выбор университета для обучения британскими, российскими и французскими абитуриентами // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2019. № 446. С. 90-95.

Калачева Т.Г, Абросимова Л.В. Установки выпускников школ на получение высшего образования // Социологические исследования. 2000. № 5. С. 98-102.

Кузьминов Я.И., Фрумин И.Д., Абанкина И.В, Алашкевич М.Ю, Болотов В.А, Добрякова М.С., Косарецкий С.Г. Как сделать образование двигателем социально-экономического развития? М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2019. 284 с.

Рябоконь М.В. Модели поведения абитуриентов при выборе вуза // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. Серия: Социальные науки. 2016. № 4 (44). С. 177-185.

Терентьев К..Ю. Образовательные стратегии абитуриентов вузов: опыт построения классификации // Непрерывное образование: XXI век. 2015. № 3 (11). С. 13-25.

Barro, R.J. & Lee, J.-W. (2001). International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Oxford Economics Papers 3. Oxford University Press, 541-563.

Jaoul-Grammare M, Magdalou B. Opportunities in Higher Education: An Application to France. // Annals of Economics and Statistics / Annales d'Économie et de Statistique. 2013. No. 1. Р. 295-325. DOI: 10.2307/23646335

Lin, T.-C. (2004). The role of higher education in economic development: an empirical study of Taiwan case. Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 355-371.

Petrakis, P.E. & Stamatakis, D. (2002). Growth and educational levels: a comparative analysis. Economics of Education Review, 21, 513-521.

Sedova T.V. Intellectual capital of the university staff in the context of reforming the education system / Sedova T.V. // Collection of scientific works of the faculty, postgraduates and undergraduates of the Institute of Management in the Economic, Environmental and Social Systems of SFedU. Edited by Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor V.V. Petrova: "Society, culture, science: problems of convergent development" Rostov-on-Don - 2014. - pp. 89-96.

Self, S. & Grabowski, R. (2004). Does Education at all levels cause growth? India, a case study. Economics of Education Review, 23, 47-55.

Sequeira R., M.T.C. da C. (2006). Incentivos ao Investimento e Desenvolvimento Regional. Tese de Doutoramento. UTAD. Vila Real. Portugal, 406.

Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS). Through the lens of students: how perceptions of higher education influence applicants' choices. Cheltenham: UCAS, 2016. 83 р.

Wang, Y. & Yao, Y. (2003). Sources of China's economic growth 1952-1999: incorporating human capital accumulation. China Economic Review, 14, 32-52.

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

1.
Успаева МГ, Гачаев АМ. Investments in innovative projects based on universities. УО [Internet]. 2021Sep.15 [cited 2024Jun.30];11(4):250-8. Available from: https://emreview.ru/index.php/emr/article/view/148

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>