NEW MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN PEDAGOGY

Trends of digital transformation of management in the field of higher education

Authors

  • Denis G. Korovyakovsky Institute of the Russian Language of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
  • Elena V. Lovech Russian State University for the Humanities, Institute of Mass Media and Advertising

How to cite

GOST Korovyakovsky D. G., Lovech E. V. Trends of digital transformation of management in the field of higher education // Education Management Review. 2024. Vol. 14. No. 9-2. P. 187-196.
APA Korovyakovsky, D. G. & Lovech, E. V. (2024). Trends of digital transformation of management in the field of higher education. Education Management Review, 14(9-2), 187-196.

Abstract

The article discusses the key aspects of the digital transformation of management in higher education. Based on the analysis of modern research, the main trends in the introduction of digital technologies into university management processes are highlighted: the use of Big Data for decision-making, the development of online platforms for organizing the educational process, and automation of administrative tasks. A survey of 120 representatives of the management staff of Russian universities was conducted, which showed that 78% of respondents consider the digitalization of management a priority. At the same time, 54% noted the insufficient level of digital competencies of employees as the main barrier to digital transformation. Recommendations on the development of digital culture in the management of universities and improving the effectiveness of technological innovation are formulated. The regression model allowed us to identify the key factors hindering the digital transformation of management in universities: lack of digital competencies of staff (β=-0.352, p<0.001), limited financial resources (β=-0.241, p<0.01) and weak coordination of initiatives (β=-0.197, p<0.05). Cluster analysis revealed a significant differentiation of universities by the level of digital maturity: leaders (18.3%), characterized by a strategic focus on digitalization and developed competencies; followers (44.2%) with fragmented technology adoption; laggards (37.5%) with a low priority of transformation. The study showed that there are gaps in the assessment of the importance of digitalization by various university stakeholders and the need to develop a balanced approach to change management, taking into account the interests of all groups.

Keywords

digital transformation university management higher education digital technologies process automation igital competencies.

References

Абдрахманова Г.И., Ковалева Г.Г. Цифровизация бизнес-процессов // Высшее образование в России. 2018. № 10. С. 52-60.

Днепровская Н.В. Оценка готовности российского высшего образования к цифровой экономике // Статистика и экономика. 2018. № 4. С. 16-28.

Кочергин Д.Г., Жернов Е.Е. Опыт цифровой трансформации зарубежных университетов // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2019. № 3. С. 37-48.

Сероштан М.В., Кетова Н.П. Современные российские университеты: позиционирование, тренды развития, возможности наращивания конкурентных преимуществ // Высшее образование в России. 2018. № 7. С. 87-101.

Bronstein S., Graham C. Digital transformation in higher education: A framework for maturity assessment // Tertiary education and management. 2019. Vol. 25. № 4. рр. 335-348.

Coates H., Matthews K.E. Change readiness in higher education: A digital transformation perspective // Higher education research & development. 2018. Vol. 37. № 5. рр. 1063-1078.

Crosby D., Andrews T. Digital leadership in higher education: Purposeful social media in a connected world // Frontiers in еducation. 2019. Vol. 4. Art. 71.

Díaz-García I., Díaz-Díaz R., Rodríguez-González A. The digital transformation of university management: Towards a university 4.0 // Journal of management and business education. 2019. Vol. 2. № 3. рр. 187-205.

Hollands F., Tirthali D. MOOCs: Expectations and reality // Center for benefit-cost studies of education, Teachers college. NY: Columbia University, 2014. 211 p.

Iosad A., Papadopoulos T., Iniesto F. Digital technologies and management education: The role of online simulations in experiential learning // The international journal of management education. 2019. Vol. 17. № 3. Art.100310.

Kaplan A., Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster // Business horizons. 2016. Vol. 59. № 4. pp. 441-450.

Marshall S. Shaping the university of the future. Singapore: Springer, 2018. 264 p.

Min S., Khoon C.C., Tan B.L. Motives, expectations, perceptions and satisfaction of international students pursuing higher education in Singapore // International journal of marketing studies. 2012. Vol. 4. № 6. pp. 122-138.

O'Keefe L., Rafferty J., Gunder A., Vignare K. Delivering high-quality instruction online in response to COVID-19: Faculty playbook // Online Learning Consortium. 2020. 63 p.

Xiao J. Digital transformation in higher education

Published

2024-09-30

Issue

Section

NEW MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN PEDAGOGY

Metrics

418 views
178 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Machine-readable metadata

Most read articles by the same author(s)