Mixed training in medical institutions of higher education

Authors

  • Gaina A. Arsakhanova Medical Institute, Chechen State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25726/i2258-3306-3069-p

Keywords:

University, medicine, mixed education, digitalization

Abstract

In the second decade of the XXI century, the introduction of electronic and digital devices in all links of public relations reached an outstanding scale, which was also noted in the educational process of higher education institutions. The development of the modern educational environment of the university is impossible without the use of digital learning tools (CSOs) such as: distance learning platforms (EQUITY MAPS, GOOGLE CLASSROOM, MOODLE), mobile digital applications (CLASTIME, LEARNINGAPPS, QUIZIZZ) and online communication platforms (GOOGLE MEET, ZOOM, WEBEX). A special place in the context of the introduction of CSR belongs to medical education, where the level of personal training of the applicant (theoretical and practical) is very important in the context of saving human lives. Digital learning tools allow you to use the features of a modern applicant with his constant stay in the digital space for the purpose of training before the introduction of restrictive measures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The educational process should not stop, and applicants should receive a high-quality education, but it is necessary to maintain a balance between classroom and distance forms of knowledge and skills transfer. The educational technology of mixed learning can come to the aid of participants in the educational process. This training technology is quite new and dynamically developing, it is indispensable for full-time training. This educational technology of providing educational services combines the best aspects and advantages of teaching in the classroom and interactive or distance learning, creates accessible courses for educational applicants, in which the educational process is a system, consists of different parts that function in constant interrelation with each other, forming an integral educational environment of the university.

References

Brechtel L, Wormack L, Frazier A, et al. Middle school students: active learning activities for stroke education and healthy lifestyles. J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28:1955–64.

Clark RM, Kaw A. Adaptive learning in a numerical methods course for engineers: evaluation in blended and flipped classrooms. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2020;28:62-79.

Fazal M, Panzano B, Luk K. Evaluating the Impact of blended learning: a mixed-methods study with difference-in-difference analysis. TechTrends. 2020;64:70–8.

Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2004; 7(2): 95-105.

Isayeva O, Shumylo M, Khmilyar I, Myskiv I, Mylyk O. Blended learning in higher medical education: principles and strategies of teaching foreign languages. Advanced Education. 2020:11–18.

Lochner L, Wieser H, Waldboth S, Mischo-Kelling M. Combining traditional anatomy lectures with e-learning activities: how do students perceive their learning experience? Int J Med Educ [Internet]. 2016; 7: 69-74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26897012

McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D. A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2015;71:255–270.

Netto Cezar PH, Guimarães FT, Gomes AP, Rôças G, Siqueira-Batista R. Transição paradigmática na educação médica: um olhar construtivista dirigido à aprendizagem baseada em problemas. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2010; 34(2): 298-303.

Phillips A, Pane JF, Reumann-Moore R, Shenbanjo O. Implementing an adaptive intelligent tutoring system as an instructional supplement. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020;68:1409–37.

Rondon S, Sassi FC, Furquim de Andrade CR. Computer game-based and traditional learning method: a comparison regarding students' knowledge retention. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2013; 13(1): 30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23442203

Saric-Grgic I, Grubisic A, Seric L, Robinson TJ. Student clustering Based on learning behavior data in the intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies. 2020;18:73–89.

Sharma N, Iain D, Dong C. Adaptive learning in medical education: The final piece of technology enhanced learning? Ulster Med J. 2017;86:198–200.

Tashiro J, Hebeler A. An adaptive blended learning health education model for families of a parent with serious medical problems. In: Cheung SKS, Lee LK, Simonova I, Kozel T, Kwok LF, eds. Blended learning: Educational innovation for personalized learning, Icbl 2019, 2019; 59–71.

Valero G, Cárdenas P. Formative and summative assessment in veterinary pathology and other courses at a Mexican veterinary college. J Vet Med Educ [Internet]. 2016; 25: 1-7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27779920

Wangwattana B, Lertnattee V. Adaptive content development for blended Learning in microscopic of herbal medicines. In: Cheung SKS, Lee LK, Simonova I, Kozel T, Kwok LF, eds. Blended learning: Educational innovation for personalized learning, Icbl 2019, 2019; 137–148

Published

2021-08-15

How to Cite

1.
Arsakhanova GA. Mixed training in medical institutions of higher education. УО [Internet]. 2021 Aug. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];11(4):99-108. Available from: https://emreview.ru/index.php/emr/article/view/130

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>