The role of an interdisciplinary approach in the design of educational programs for the Master's degree in technical fields
How to cite
Abstract
Modern challenges of global technological development require fundamentally new
approaches to the design of master's degree programs in technical fields. This study analyzes the role of an interdisciplinary approach as a key factor in increasing the effectiveness and relevance of higher technical education in the context of the rapid transformation of the labor market. Based on a comprehensive analysis of international experience and educational practices of leading universities, the key principles and methodological foundations for designing interdisciplinary programs have been identified. The work uses a combined research toolkit, including system-structural analysis, expert interviewing and statistical data processing methods. The empirical database includes data on 38 master's degree programs in technical fields at universities in Russia and abroad. The results of the study demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between the degree of integration of interdisciplinary elements into educational programs and graduate employment rates (r=0.78), and also indicate
a 43% increase in academic mobility with the introduction of interdisciplinary modules. It has been revealed that the optimal model of interdisciplinary integration involves a balanced combination of fundamental training (47% of the curriculum) and applied project-oriented activities (53%) organized around complex problem-oriented tasks. The proposed conceptual model for designing interdisciplinary programs opens up prospects for the transformation of engineering education towards the formation of professionals who are able to effectively solve complex technological and social problems in conditions of uncertainty and rapid change.
Keywords
References
Ahern A., Dominguez C., McNally C., O'Sullivan J.J., Pedrosa D. A literature review of critical thinking in engineering education // Studies in higher education. 2019. № 44(5). рр. 816-828.
Aram J.D. Concepts of Interdisciplinarity: Configurations of Knowledge and Action // Human Relations. 2004. № 57(4). рр. 379-412.
Boix Mansilla V., Duraisingh E.D., Wolfe C.R., Haynes C. Targeted assessment rubric: an empirically grounded rubric for interdisciplinary writing // The journal of higher education. 2009. № 80(3). рр. 334-353.
Borrego M., Newswander L.K. Definitions of interdisciplinary research: toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes // The review of higher education. 2010. № 34(1).рр. 61-84.
Costa A.R., Ferreira M., Barata A., Viterbo C., Rodrigues J.S., Magalhаes J. Impact of interdisciplinary learning on the development of engineering students' skills // European journal of engineering education. 2019. № 44(4). рр. 589-601.
Di Giulio A., Defila R. Enabling university educators to equip students with inter- and transdisciplinary competencies // International journal of sustainability in higher education. 2017. № 18(5). рр. 630-647.
Drake S.M., Reid J.L. 21st Century Competencies in Light of the History of Integrated Curriculum // Frontiers in education. 2020. № 5. Р. 122.
Feng X., Holtta-Otto K. An exploration of teachers' competencies in interdisciplinary engineering education // Proceedings of ASME Inter. design engin. tech. conf. and Comp. and inform. in engin. conf. 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Metrics
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Education Management Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.