Comparative analysis of educational results of students of rural and urban schools on the example of the Tomsk region

Authors

  • Anna V. Pivovarova Tomsk State Pedagogical University
  • Elena E. Sartakova Tomsk State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25726/j3192-9280-7683-i

Keywords:

participants of relations in the field of education, rural school, rural territories, educational results of schoolchildren, comparative analysis

Abstract

In Russia at the beginning of the XXI century . the development of a general education system that meets the needs of the emerging information society in rural areas was carried out in the process of implementing various concepts and programs (restructuring, introduction of specialized training, a comprehensive education modernization project, modernization of regional educational systems, introduction of Federal State Educational Standards of General Education (hereinafter referred to as the Federal State Educational Standard), etc.), which led to the development of innovative processes not only in the field of educational content, ways of its implementation, but also the organization of the processes of education and upbringing. Thus, the implementation of the National Project "Education" involves solving the tasks of creating a general education system that is among the top 10 in the world. In this article, a comparative analysis of the educational results of students of rural and urban schools is carried out. The educational achievements of rural school students differ from those shown by urban students, and are due to various factors. In the conditions of rural areas, the interaction of the main participants in relations in the field of education among themselves becomes especially significant: the pedagogical and administrative staff of the school, students, their parents, educational authorities at the municipal and regional levels.

References

Андрейко А.З. Сельский социокультурный комплекс как фактор развития образования: автореф. дис. ... канд. пед. наук: 13.00.06. М., 1996. 24с.

Бабанский Ю.К. Оптимизация процесса обучения: общедидактический аспект. М.: Педагогика, 1977. 254с.

Гурьянова М.П. Теоретические основы модернизации сельской школы России: дис. … д-р. пед. наук : 13.00.02. М., 2001. 412с.

Информационно-аналитический отчет и методические рекомендации «Анализрезультатов государственной итоговой аттестации выпускников 2019 года общеобразовательных организаций томской области в форме основного государственного экзамена // Центр мониторинга и оценки качества образования. http://coko.tomsk.ru/files/reports/analit-oge-2019.pdf.

Обоянцева О.В. Условия формирования кадрового ресурса нового типа как механизма комплексных структурных изменений малокомплектных школ Томской области // Вестник Томского государственного педагогического университета. 2009. №12 (90). С. 51–56.

Сартакова Е.Е. Сетевое взаимодействие сельских ОУ в условиях социокультурной модернизации образования: дис. … д-р. пе. наук: 13.00.01. Томск, 2015. 461с.

Цирульников А.М. Сельская школа: проблемы и перспективы развития М.: ВНИК Школа, 1994. 75с.

Bruyninckx, S., Vanderfaeillie, J., Van Dooren, E., Van Puyenbroeck, B., & Van Holen, F. (2021). Recognition and reporting of child abuse by personnel of Flemish rural primary schools. Children and Youth Services Review, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106267

Hamdani, S. U., Huma, Z. E., Suleman, N., Warraitch, A., Muzzafar, N., Farzeen, M., … Wissow, L. S. (2021). Scaling-up school mental health services in low resource public schools of rural Pakistan: the Theory of Change (ToC) approach. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-021-00435-5

Liu, Q., Huang, S., Qu, X., & Yin, A. (2021). The status of health promotion lifestyle and its related factors in Shandong Province, China. BMC Public Health, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11152-6

Mahadevan, R., & Fan, S. (2021). Differential Effects of Parents’ Education on Adolescent Wellbeing Outcomes. Child Indicators Research, 14(6), 2495–2516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09856-7

Mhlana, S., Chipangura, B., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2022). Conceptualizing Factors that Influence Learners’ Intention to Adopt ICT for Learning in Rural Schools in Developing Countries. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 236, 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2380-6_34

Michaels-Strasser, S., Thurman, P. W., Kasongo, N. M., Kapenda, D., Ngulefac, J., Lukeni, B.,… Malele, F. (2021). Increasing nursing student interest in rural healthcare: lessons from a rural rotation program in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Human Resources for Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00598-9

Pulling Kuhn, A., Kim, E., Lane, H. G., Wang, Y., Deitch, R., Turner, L., … Parker, E. A. (2021). Associations between elementary and middle school teachers’ physical activity promoting practices and teacher- and school-level factors. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01129-4

Wang, H., Frasco, E., Takesue, R., & Tang, K. (2021). Maternal education level and maternal healthcare utilization in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: an analysis of the multiple indicator cluster survey 2017/18. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06854-x

Published

2021-10-15

How to Cite

1.
Пивоварова АВ, Сартакова ЕЕ. Comparative analysis of educational results of students of rural and urban schools on the example of the Tomsk region. УО [Internet]. 2021Oct.15 [cited 2024Jun.30];11(5):86-92. Available from: https://emreview.ru/index.php/emr/article/view/160