Characteristics of the modern model of rural schools in the context of socio-cultural modernization of education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25726/c5697-6377-6668-rKeywords:
rural school, modern model, ontological approach, spatial approach, socio-cultural approach, anthropological approaches, competence approach, system-activity approach.Abstract
The modern rural school is a unique phenomenon of the educational process. In the last decades of the twentieth century, the most significant phenomenon in the world community was the processes of networking, digitalization of socio-economic activities, which contributed to the innovative development of the social sphere, including rural schools. Modernization, which is necessary both for humanity as a whole, which inhabits the planet, and for the individual, who strives for a harmonious stay on this planet. The current state of society is characterized by its transition to a new, higher level of socio-cultural development. Therefore, the socio-cultural component is the main one in the process of modernization of everything-education, economy, business, and even more so – the country. It allows for the simultaneous renewal of various spheres of society most effectively and least painfully, since it takes into account the mechanisms of social change – the cultural coordinate system, the peculiarities of mentality, moral postulates, the self-consciousness of the nation, the historical memory of the people. Such an "integrated modernization" can ensure the country's security and competitiveness. This article presents the modern model of rural schools as a new look at the development of rural and rural educational organizations, provides a theoretical justification of the model, its approach and methods. The modern model significantly affects the development of the subjects of the educational process, whose promising activities ensure the development of rural areas.
References
Гурьянова М.П. Теоретические основы модернизации сельской школы России: дис.... д-ра пед. наук. М., 2001. С. 89–174.
Статистика в образовании. https://vawilon.ru/statistika-obrazovaniya (дата обращения: 01.05.2019 г.).
Андрейко А.З. Сельский социокультурный комплекс как фактор развития образования: автореф. дис.... канд. пед. наук. М., 1996. С. 11–13.
Ключевые проблемы региональных образовательных систем: опыт анализа / под ред. А.М. Моисеева; Ин-т «Открытое общество»; Фонд Сороса – Россия. М.: РОССПЕН, 2002. 284 с.
Поверх барьеров: истории школ, работающих в сложных социальных условиях / сост.: С.Г. Косарецкий, М.А. Пинская, Н.В. Бысик, А.Б. Милкус. М.: Изд. дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2019. 214 c. 12.
Силласте Г.Г. Сельская молодежь в лабиринте средств массовой информации. М.: ИСПС РАО, 2005. 287 c.
Рассказова Л.В. Модели организации процесса в становления школы России: автореф. дис.... пед. наук. Томск, 2014. С. 11–15.
Сартакова Е.Е. Сетевое взаимодействие сельских ОУ в условиях социокультурной модернизации образования: дис. … д-ра пед. наук. Томск, 2015. C. 156–174.
Bethell, G., & Zabulionis, A. (2012). The evolution of high-stakes testing at the school–university interface in the former republics of the USSR. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 1–19.
Boni, A., & Walker, M. (2016). Universities and global human development: theoretical and empirical insights for social change. London: Routledge.
Campbell, A. C., & Mawer, M. (2019). Clarifying mixed messages: international scholarship programmes in the sustainable development agenda. Higher Education Policy, 32(2), 167–184.
Jerrard, J. (2016). What does “quality” look like for post-2015 education provision in low-income countries? An exploration of stakeholders’ perspectives of school benefits in village LEAP schools, rural Sindh, Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development, 46, 82–93.
McCowan, T. (2016). Universities and the post-2015 development agenda: an analytical framework. Higher Education, 72(4), 505–523.
Opposs, D., Baird, J.-A., Chankseliani, M., Stobart, G., Kaushik, A., McManus, H., & Johnson, D. (2020). Governance structure and standard setting in educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(2), 192–214.
Sayed, Y., & Ahmed, R. (2015). Education quality, and teaching and learning in the post-2015 education agenda. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 330–338.
