Simulation modeling of spiritual and moral qualities of modern youth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25726/i6464-3777-5085-fKeywords:
spiritual and moral qualities, youth, modeling, studentsAbstract
In the context of the study of intellectual and informational civilization as a cycle of socio-natural evolution, special emphasis is placed on the consideration of education as a mechanism of upward reproduction of the quality of public intelligence, that is, the unity of public consciousness and the unity of public knowledge, the unity of education, science and culture. Public intelligence from the form of "mind-for-itself" passes into the form of the existence of mind for the biosphere, which places high demands on the quality of the educational system in society. There should be an expansion of education to society as a whole. The civilizational shift at the end of the XX century is a reflection of the educational and pedagogical formation revolution, which reflects the transition from the educational and pedagogical formation of enlightenment (the end of the 300-year educational information cycle) to the educational and pedagogical formation of an "educational society" in which the main product is not an educational service, but the person himself, his socialization, the quality of his intelligence and the quality of public intelligence. The purpose of the article is to conduct simulation modeling of spiritual and moral qualities of modern youth. Materials and methods. The following research methods were used: - theoretical: the study and analysis of philosophical and psychological and pedagogical literature to reveal the essence of theoretical and methodological approaches to the problem of research; theoretical generalization and systematization, with the help of which the characteristics of the problem field of research were provided and the essence of the spiritual and cultural values of education was clarified; - empirical: pedagogical observation, conversations, discussions, questionnaires, training, pedagogical experiment (ascertaining and forming) to determine the levels of formation of spiritual and cultural values of education among students; analysis of research results to verify the effectiveness of the organizational and methodological system of their formation; - statistical-collection and statistical processing of experimental data. Results. It is proved that for the revival of the spiritual and cultural component of education today it is necessary to re focus higher education on the spiritual and cultural development of the student's personality, the formation of his spiritual and cultural values of education as the basis for the transmission of spiritual, not material culture, the development of not just a literate person, but a harmoniously and comprehensively developed, broad-minded, spiritually-culturally educated personalities. The practical significance of the study is determined by the fact that the results of the study can be used by specialized specialists to improve the results of their own research.
References
Гасаненко Е.А., Пономарёва Л.Д., Царан А.А. Профессиональный имидж как фактор успешного профессионального становления студента технического вуза // Проблемы современного педагогического образования. 2018. № 59-1. С. 114-117.
Дубовицкая Т.Д. Методика диагностики направленности учебной мотивации // Психологическая наука и образование. 2002. № 2. С. 42-45.
Лимонова О.О., Дрожжина Н.Б. Психологические детерминанты профессиональноличностного становления студентов вуза // Казанский педагогический журнал. 2019. № 2 (133). С. 111- 115.
Литвинова Н.Б. Роль управления взаимодействием систем обучения в развитии профессиональных способностей будущих специалистов (на примере инженерной графики) // Вестник евразийской науки. 2015. Т. 7, № 1 (26) С. 129. https://doi.org/10.15862/119PVN115.
Мазурицкий М.И., Солдатов А.В. Интерактивные сетевые научно-образовательные ресурсы для естественно-научного образования. Высшее образование в России. 20147 № 1. С. 80-87.
Опросник для изучения степени удовлетворенности своим функционированием в различных сферах (И. Колер). http://tempus-allmeet.ipps.sfu kras.ru/www_1/Ank5/index.html
Подлесный С.А. Электронное обучение и обеспечение его качества // Инженерное образование. 2013. № 127 С. 104-111.
Программа «Цифровая экономика РФ» (утверждена распоряжением Правительства Ф от 28 июня 2017 г. № 1632-р).
Хоменко В.Г. Построение модели дуальных профессиональных компетентностей будущих инженеров-педагогов компьютерного профиля // ОТО. 2015. №2. С. 409-427.
Цыгулева М.В. Рефлексивный компонент в структуре профессиональной компетентности инженера // Вестник СИБИТа. 2016. №4 (20). С. 174-181.
Янова М.Г. Диагностика организационно-педагогической культуры будущего учителя // Вестник Красноярского государственного педагогического университета им. В.П. Астафьева. 2011. № 2. С. 136-143.
Cyber-physical laboratories in engineering and science education/ Eds. M. E. Auer, A. K. M. Azad, A. Edwards, T. De Jong. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature, 2018. 434 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76935-6
Herzberg F., Mausner B., Snyderman B.B. The Motivation to Work. N.Y., 1959. 157 p.
Ivannikov A. D., Tumkovskiy S. R. Internet portals as integration means of access to educational resources. Proc. of 10th Intern. Technology, Education and Development Conf, INTED2016, Valencia, IATED Academy, 2016, pp. 7337-7343. doi:10.21125/int-ed.2016.0731
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2.
Kroes, P. (2009a). Foundational issues of engineering design. In D. M. Gabbay, P. Thagard, & J. Woods (Eds.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, (pp. 513–541). The Netherlands: North Holland Elsevier.
Kroes, P. (2009b). Introduction to part III. In D. M. Gabbay, P. Thagard, & J. Woods (Eds.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, (pp. 405–408). The Netherlands: North Holland-Elsevier.
Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20111.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (2016). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Malden: Massachusetts Department of Education Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2016-04.pdf.
Mathis, C. A., Siverling, E. A., Glancy, A. W., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Teachers’ incorporation of argumentation to support engineering learning in STEM integration curricula. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 7(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1163.
Mentzer, N., Becker, K., & Sutton, M. (2015). Engineering design thinking: High school students’ performance and knowledge. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20105.
Museum of Science (2019). Engineering is elementary [Curriculum]. Boston, MA. Retrieved from https://www.eie.org/eie-curriculum
Nathan, M. J., Atwood, A. K., Prevost, A., Phelps, L. A., & Tran, N. A. (2011). How professional development in Project Lead the Way changes high school STEM teachers’ beliefs about engineering education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1027.
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 results (volume V): collaborative problem solving. Paris: OECD Publishing Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en.
Pang, J., & Good, R. (2000). A review of the integration of science and mathematics: implications for further research. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17239.x.
Peters-Burton, E. E., & Johnson, T. (2018). Cross-case analysis of engineering education experiences in inclusive stem-focused high schools in the United States. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 6(4), 320–342. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.440335.
Purzer, S. (2018). How different are engineering design projects?: An analysis of middle school lessons and units. Denmark: European Society of Engineering Education (SEFI), Copenhagen Retrieved from https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/SEFI-Proceedings-2-October-2018.pdf.
Purzer, Ş., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 9.
