TECHNOLOGIZATION OF THE PEDAGOGICAL PROCESS

Problems and prospects of the introduction of bilingual education in non-linguistic higher education institutions as a factor in improving the quality of specialist training

Authors

  • Oksana L. Mokhova Moscow International University
  • Oleg I. Basherov A.N. Kosygin Russian State University
  • Natalia D. Ovchinnikova Russian University of Transport
  • Kira V. Trostina Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

How to cite

GOST Mokhova O. L., Basherov O. I., Ovchinnikova N. D., Trostina K. V. Problems and prospects of the introduction of bilingual education in non-linguistic higher education institutions as a factor in improving the quality of specialist training // Education Management Review. 2024. Vol. 14. No. 9-1. P. 128-137.
APA Mokhova, O. L., Basherov, O. I., Ovchinnikova, N. D. & Trostina, K. V. (2024). Problems and prospects of the introduction of bilingual education in non-linguistic higher education institutions as a factor in improving the quality of specialist training. Education Management Review, 14(9-1), 128-137.

Abstract

The article discusses the problems and prospects of introducing bilingual education in non-linguistic universities as a factor in improving the quality of specialist training. An analysis of modern research in highly rated journals has revealed a growing interest in this topic, but also discrepancies in terminology and gaps in the study of practical experience. The purpose of the work is to systematize conceptual approaches, propose a unified conceptual framework and identify key areas for improving bilingual programs, taking into account the specifics of non–linguistic universities. The methodology includes a comprehensive literature analysis, case comparison, and expert interviews (n=25). A terminological apparatus has been formed, including the author's definitions of bilingual education, subject-language integrated learning, and translingual competence. The main barriers to the implementation of bilingual programs have been identified: a shortage of qualified personnel (84% of experts note), insufficient motivation of students (76%), organizational difficulties (64%). A conceptual model of the phased implementation of bilingual education in non-linguistic universities has been developed, tested at the Russian Technical University (N=120). The effectiveness of the model is confirmed by higher academic performance (+18%, p<0.01), publication activity (+24%, p<0.05) and employment (+14%, p<0.05) among the program participants compared with the control group. The results obtained contribute to the development of the theory of bilingual education and are of practical importance for non-linguistic universities. Further research may be aimed at cross-cultural analysis of the implementation of bilingual programs.

Keywords

bilingual education non-linguistic universities subject-language integrated learning translingual competence quality of specialist training

References

Dafouz E., Smit U. ROAD-MAPPING English medium education in the internationalised university. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 163 р.

Dewaele J.M. The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward English, and teacher behavior on willingness to communicate among English foreign language learners // Journal of language and social psychology. 2019. № 38(4). рр. 523-535.

Galloway N., Rose H. Incorporating Global Englishes into the ELT classroom // ELT journal. 2018. № 72(1). рр. 3-14.

Garcia O., Wei L. Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Cham: Palgrave Pivot, 2014. 175 p.

Lasagabaster D., Doiz A. Language errors in an English-medium instruction university setting: How do language versus content teachers tackle them? // Porta linguarum. 2018. № 30. рр. 131-148.

Macaro E., Curle S., Pun J., An J., Dearden, J. A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education // Language teaching. 2018. № 51(1). рр. 36-76.

Marsh D., Frigols M.J. Content and language integrated learning. Ed. by C.A. Chapelle // The Encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2013. pp. 1-10.

Martinez R., Fernandez P. Development of the observation protocol for academic language and literacy instruction and student engagement: A tool for supporting effective instruction // International multilingual research journal. 2020. № 14(4). рр. 345-359.

Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement // PLoS Medicine: e1000097, 2009. № 6(7).

Sahan K. ELF interaction in English-medium engineering classrooms // ELT journal. 2020. № 74(4). рр. 418-427.

Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. NY.: SAGE Рublications, 1998. 336 р.

Tsou W., Kao S.M. English as a medium of instruction in higher education: Implementations and classroom practices in Taiwan. NY.: Springer. 2017. 213 р.

Van Eck N.J., Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping // Scientometrics. 2009. № 84. рр. 523-538.

Wang Y., Xu H. Ideology and identity debate of English-medium instruction in China: Past, present, and future // Asian Englishes. 2019. № 22(1). рр. 1-16.

Wilkinson R. Content and language integration at universities? Collaborative reflections // International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism. 2018. № 21(5). рр. 607-615.

Published

2024-08-15

Issue

Section

TECHNOLOGIZATION OF THE PEDAGOGICAL PROCESS

Metrics

939 views
148 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>