DATA SCIENCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SPACE

Impact of using AI systems on students' learning motivation: risk of reduced autonomy

Authors

How to cite

GOST Asmanova P. D., Bystrov I. A., Alekseeva T. V. Impact of using AI systems on students' learning motivation: risk of reduced autonomy // Education Management Review. 2025. Vol. 15. No. 12-1. P. 120-130. DOI: 10.25726/j1063-9756-7276-d
APA Asmanova, P. D., Bystrov, I. A. & Alekseeva, T. V. (2025). Impact of using AI systems on students' learning motivation: risk of reduced autonomy. Education Management Review, 15(12-1), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.25726/j1063-9756-7276-d

Abstract

This article examines the impact of artificial intelligence on student motivation and autonomy in the educational process. It demonstrates that excessive reliance on AI tools can undermine students' intrinsic motivation, weakening their sense of competence and autonomy. Key risks include decreased cognitive load, the development of passive information consumption, and weakened critical thinking and independent knowledge-seeking skills. At the same time, the article identifies conditions under which the use of AI can contribute to increased learning motivation: personalization of learning tailored to individual needs, the development of new forms of assessment, and the targeted development of metacognitive skills. Particular attention is paid to the ethical aspects of integrating AI into education, emphasizing the need to develop students' understanding of their responsibility for using technology, the ability to recognize algorithmic bias, and adhere to principles of privacy and data protection. The conclusion is that the successful implementation of AI in educational practice requires a balanced combination of automation and active student participation, the development of pedagogical strategies that stimulate critical understanding of information, and the establishment of an interdisciplinary dialogue between educators, AI system developers, and educational experts.

Keywords

artificial intelligence education intrinsic motivation self-determination theory personalization of learning metacognitive skills competency assessment ethical principles critical thinking pedagogical strategies

References

Алексеева Т.В., Поначугин А.В., Мелкумян Л.А. Информационные технологии как элемент образовательной среды технопарка и кванториума вуза // Педагогика. 2025. Т.89. № 4. С. 94-98.

Арифулина Р.У., Катушенко О.А. Анализ отечественных и зарубежных трендов индивидуализации образовательного процесса в вузе: аналитический доклад // Вестник Мининского университета. 2021. Т. 9. № 4. С. 2.

Волкова О.Н., Устинова Е.И., Курукина Ю.С. Подготовка будущих специалистов в области информационной безопасности в высшей школе // Педагогическая информатика. 2024. №1. С.321-329.

Лукичёв П.М., Чекмарев О.П. Риски применения искусственного интеллекта в системе высшего образования // Вопросы инновационной экономики. 2024. Т. 14. № 2. С. 463-482.

Перевощикова Е.Н. Разработка модуля по формированию исследовательских компетенций будущих педагогов и оценка их сформированности в рамках выпускной квалификационной работы // Вестник Мининского университета. 2024. Т.12. № 2. С. 2.

Azevedo R., Cromley J.G. Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? // Journal of educational psychology. 2004. Vol. 96. № 3. pp. 523-535.

Banks J.A. Multicultural education: characteristics and goals. Multicultural education: issues and perspectives. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2004. Vol. 1. pp. 3-21.

Bender E.M., Gebru T., McMillan-Major A., Shmitchell S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? // Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conf. on fairness, accountability and transparency (FAccT'21). 2021. pp. 610-623.

Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: cognitive domain. NY: David McKay Co., 1956. 207 p.

Boncillo J. AI in education: a systematic review of its applications, benefits, and ethical challenges // International journal of multidisciplinary educational research and innovation. 2025. Vol. 3. № 2. pp. 436-447.

Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. NY: Plenum Press, 1985. 348 p.

Flavell J.H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. 1979. Vol. 34. № 10. pp. 906-911.

Hattie J. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge, 2008. 392 p.

Kirschner P.A., De Bruyckere P. The myths of the digital native and the multitasker // Teaching and teacher education. 2017. Vol. 67. pp. 135-142.

Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research // Journal of engineering education. 2004. Vol. 93. № 3. pp. 223-231.

Selwyn N. Digital downsides: exploring students’ critical perspectives on digital technology in higher education // Teaching in higher education. 2016. Vol. 21. № 8. pp. 939-953.

Sweller J., Ayres P., Kalyuga S. Cognitive load theory. NY: Springer, 2011. 180 p.

Wiggins G.P. Educative assessment: designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998. 361 p.

Williamson B., Bayne S. The datafication of teaching in higher education: tracking learning and ranking educators // Learning, media and technology. 2020. Vol.45. № 2. pp. 109-124.

Issue

Section

DATA SCIENCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SPACE

Metrics

184 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Machine-readable metadata