Training of medical university students at clinical departments using the "standardized patient" methodology

Authors

  • Gaina A. Arsakhanova Medical Institute, Chechen State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25726/n4089-8670-1687-c

Keywords:

Training, students, medical universities, skills, communication

Abstract

The relevance of the” convertibility " of medical education is associated with both economic and migration, socio-cultural and other reasons. However, there is still not enough serious research that would allow an objective assessment of the existing methods of teaching foreign students, their training, assessment, and the like. There is an increasing need to develop new methods of objective training and testing that would ensure significant progress towards professionally oriented clinical assessment at all levels and stages of training and practice. The focus of assessment in medical education is shifting from a simple check of memorized medical scientific facts to the assessment of the student's actions directly in clinical conditions, that is, with a shift in assessment from the first (”I have, I know“) and the second (”I know how“) level to the third (”I demonstrate“), and sometimes even the fourth (”I do it myself"). It is clear that the work in the master's program should be limited to the 3rd and 4th levels. In medical education, this approach not only forms a complex of actively functioning algo rhythms, but also allows you to effectively assess the clinical competence of students. The aim of the work is to improve the organization of the educational process for undergraduates of the specialty “Nursing " from among foreign citizens by developing new methods of objective training and testing that would ensure significant progress towards professionally-oriented clinical assessment at all levels and stages of training and practice.

References

Alamri Y. Factors influencing decisions to become involved in research: a study of pre-clinical medical students from New Zealand. Med Sci Educ. 2019;29(2):489–492. doi:10.1007/s40670-019-00717-1

Pearson S, Ogden K, Warnecke E, Howes F. Research: why aren’t more medical students doing it? Australas Med J. 2017;10(12):1063–1070. doi:10.21767/AMJ.2017.3257

Funston G, Piper RJ, Connell C, Foden P, Young AM, O’Neill P. Medical student perceptions of research and research-orientated careers: an international questionnaire study. Med Teach. 2016;38(10):1041–1048. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2016.1150981

Chang CW, Mills JC. Effects of a reward system on resident research productivity. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(12):1285–1290. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5303

Boyle SE, Cotton SC, Myint PK, Hold GL. The influence of early research experience in medical school on the decision to intercalate and future career in clinical academia: a questionnaire study. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):245. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1066-1

Ranieri V, Barratt H, Fulop N, Rees G. Factors that influence career progression among postdoctoral clinical academics: a scoping review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e013523. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013523

Eley DS, Jensen C, Thomas R, Benham H. What will it take? Pathways, time and funding: Australian medical students’ perspective on clinician-scientist training. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):242. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1081-2

Molodynski, A, Lewis, T, Kadhum, M, et al. Cultural variations in wellbeing, burnout and substance use amongst medical students in twelve countries [published online ahead of print March 18, 2020]. Int Rev Psychiatry. doi:10.1080/09540261.2020.1738064.

Cao, W, Fang, Z, Hou, G, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112934. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934.

Kumar A, Kumar P, Palvia SCJ, et al. Online education worldwide: current status and emerging trends. J Inform Tech Case Applicat Res 2017;19:3-9.doi:10.1080/15228053.2017.1294867

Ebner C, Gegenfurtner A. Learning and satisfaction in Webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: a meta-analysis. Front Educ 2019;4:92.doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00092

Anthonysamy L, Koo A-C, Hew S-H. Self-Regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: a one decade review. Educ Inf Technol 2020;25:3677–704.doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10134-2

Lin H-C, Hwang G-J. Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: a review of Journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interact Learn Environ 2019;27:1011–27.doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462

Kassab M, DeFranco J, Laplante P. A systematic literature review on internet of things in education: benefits and challenges. J Comput Assist Learn 2020;36:115–27.doi:10.1111/jcal.12383

Choudhury S, Pattnaik S. Emerging themes in e-learning: A review from the stakeholders’ perspective. Comput Educ 2020;144:103657. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103657

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

1.
Arsakhanova GA. Training of medical university students at clinical departments using the "standardized patient" methodology. УО [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];11(4):225-33. Available from: https://emreview.ru/index.php/emr/article/view/145