INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

International practice of the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind

Authors

  • Deyu Meng Qingdao Agricultural University

How to cite

GOST Meng D. International practice of the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind // Education Management Review. 2024. Vol. 14. No. 12-2. P. 286-292.
APA Meng, D. (2024). International practice of the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind. Education Management Review, 14(12-2), 286-292.

Abstract

This study explores the international practice and diffusion of the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind, a vision for global governance and development proposed by China. Through a systematic review of official policy documents, academic literature, and quantitative data, we trace the evolution and implementation of this concept in various multilateral forums and international cooperation initiatives from 2012 to 2023. Results reveal growing global engagement with the concept, as evidenced by its incorporation into UN resolutions, regional organization charters, and bilateral agreements. Textual analysis demonstrates increasing alignment of the concept's key principles with the sustainable development agenda. However, challenges remain in translating the macro-level vision into specific governance mechanisms. We discuss the theoretical implications for understanding norm diffusion in a multipolar world order and identify practical avenues for further research and multi-stakeholder dialogue to advance this future-oriented global governance paradigm

Keywords

global governance sustainable development international cooperation Belt and Road Initiative multipolarization

References

Acharya A. The end of American world order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014. 96 р.

Chen D., Wang J. Lying low no more? China's new thinking on the Tao Guang Yang Hui strategy // China: An international journal. 2011. № 9(2). рр. 195-216.

Deng Y. China's struggle for status: The realignment of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 314 р.

Flockhart T. The coming multi-order world // Contemporary Security Policy, 2016. № 37(1). рр. 3-30.

Foot R. China's rise and US hegemony: Renegotiating hegemonic order in East Asia? // International politics. 2019. № 57. рр. 150-165.

Ikenberry G.J. Why the liberal world order will survive // Ethics & international affairs. 2018. № 32(1). рр. 17-29.

Johnston A.I. China in a world of orders: Rethinking compliance and challenge in Beijing's international relations // International security. 2019. № 44(2). рр. 9-60.

Kupchan C.A. No one's world: The West, the rising rest and the coming global turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 272 р.

Nordin A., Weissmann M. Will Trump make China great again? The belt and road initiative and international order // International affairs. 2018. № 94(2). рр. 231-249.

Shambaugh D. China goes global: The partial power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 409 р.

Stubbs R. Order and contestation in the Asia-Pacific region: Liberal vs developmental/non-interventionist approaches // The Pacific review. 2018. № 31(1). рр. 1-31.

Wang, Y. Offensive for defensive: The belt and road initiative and China's new grand strategy // The Pacific review.2016. № 29(3). рр. 455-463.

Yan X. The influence of world order and China's grand strategy // World Economics and Politics. 2015. № (9). рр. 5-39.

Zhang F. The rise of Chinese exceptionalism in international relations // European journal of international relations. 2013. № 19(2). рр. 305-328.

Zhao S. A revisionist stakeholder: China and the post-World War II world order // Journal of contemporary China. 2018. № 27(113). рр. 643-658.

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Metrics

301 views
344 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Machine-readable metadata