Development of an integrated methodology for teaching English at a university, taking into account intercultural communication
How to cite
Abstract
This study is devoted to the development of an integrated methodology for teaching English at a university, taking into account intercultural communication. The relevance of the topic is due to the growing need for specialists who are able to effectively interact in a global context. The purpose of the research is to create a comprehensive methodology aimed at the formation of foreign language communicative competence and intercultural awareness of students. The tasks include the analysis of existing approaches, the development of innovative methods and the approbation of the proposed methodology. The methodology is based on the integration of communicative, competence-based and intercultural approaches. The empirical base is represented by a sample of 120 students of 1-2 courses of non-linguistic specialties. The results showed a statistically significant increase in English language proficiency (t=5.67, p<0.01), as well as an increase in intercultural sensitivity (d=0.84). The developed methodology demonstrated effectiveness in the development of foreign language skills and intercultural competence of students. The data obtained contribute to the methodology of teaching foreign languages and open up prospects for further optimization of language education at the university.
Keywords
References
Карасик В.И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград: Перемена, 2002.
Byram M. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1997. 136 р.
Deardorff D.K. Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization // Journal of studies in international education. 2006. Vol. 10. № 3. рр. 241-266.
Fantini A., Tirmizi A. Research and assessment of intercultural competence. St. Louis: Washington University, Center for Social Development, 2007.
Holliday A. Intercultural communication and ideology. L.: Sage, 2011. 240 р.
Kramsch C. Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Liddicoat A.J., Scarino A. Intercultural language teaching and learning. NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. 200 р.
Martin J.N., Nakayama T.K. Intercultural communication in contexts. 6th ed. NY: McGraw-Hill, 2012. 504 р.
Moeller A.J., Osborn S.R.N. A pragmatist perspective on building intercultural communicative competency: From theory to classroom practice // Foreign language annals. 2014. Vol. 47, Iss. 4. рр. 669-683.
Sercu L. Assessing intercultural competence: More questions than answers // Testing the untestable in language education. Eds. by A. Paran, L. Sercu. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2010. pp. 17-34.
Sinicrope C., Norris J., Watanabe Y. Understanding and assessing intercultural competence: A summary of theory, research, and practice // Second language studies. 2007. Vol. 26. № 1. pp. 1-58.
Spencer-Oatey H., Franklin P. Intercultural interaction: А multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 384 р.
Ter-Minasova S.G. Language, culture and communication // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and social sciences. 2008. Vol. 1. № 3. рр. 343-347.
Ting-Toomey S., Chung L.C. Understanding intercultural communication. 2nd ed. NY: Oxford University Press, 2012. 352 р.
Wiseman R.L. Intercultural communication competence: Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. Ed. by W.B. Gudykunst. L.: Sage, 2003. pp. 191-208.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Metrics
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.