APPLIED RESEARCH

Methodological conditions for teaching choreographic improvisation to students in higher education institutions

Authors

  • Anastasia D. Pesheva Melitopol State University, 272312, Melitopol, Bohdan Khmelnytskyi Avenue, 18

How to cite

GOST Pesheva A. D. Methodological conditions for teaching choreographic improvisation to students in higher education institutions // Education Management Review. 2026. Vol. 16. No. 9. P. 515-522. DOI: 10.25726/d1568-8386-7292-o
APA Pesheva, A. D. (2026). Methodological conditions for teaching choreographic improvisation to students in higher education institutions. Education Management Review, 16(9), 515-522. https://doi.org/10.25726/d1568-8386-7292-o

Abstract

The article examines the methodological conditions for teaching choreographic improvisation to students in higher education institutions. The research problem is connected with the fact that improvisation in educational practice is often used as a separate creative technique, while it is not always integrated into the system of professional choreographic training. The purpose of the article is to provide a theoretical justification for the conditions under which improvisation becomes not merely spontaneous movement activity, but a pedagogically organized means of developing choreographic thinking. Based on the analysis of Russian and foreign studies, the article identifies the main conditions for teaching improvisation: gradual and continuous inclusion of improvisation in the educational process; structuring tasks through limitations and movement scores; integration of improvisation with technical and compositional training; organization of partner and group interaction; reflective and analytical support of students’ practice. Special attention is paid to the idea that professional improvisation is formed not through the rejection of rules, but through conscious work within a given artistic framework. The scientific novelty of the approach lies in the fact that the methodological conditions are presented not as an arbitrary list of pedagogical recommendations, but as a system derived from the analysis of studies on choreographic improvisation, dance composition and the professional training of choreographers. The article concludes that improvisation should be considered as an integral methodological model aimed at developing students’ creative independence, compositional vision and ability to professionally analyze their own movement material.

Keywords

choreographic improvisation choreographic education choreography students methodological conditions movement score dance composition partner interaction reflection

Funding

The authors did not declare any external funding for this research.

References

Vaganova A.Ya. Fundamentals of Classical Dance. 5th ed. Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1980. 192 pp.

Golubev D.V. Innovative methods of teaching contact improvisation as a means of creating a composition of contemporary dance forms // World of Science, Culture and Education. 2016. no. 6 (61). pp. 209-211.

Karpenko V.N., Chalova A.I. Methods of dance improvisation in the system of continuous education (bachelor’s degree – master’s degree) // Cultural Life of the South of Russia. 2018. no. 1 (68). pp. 68-72.

Kucherenko A.L. Some aspects of dance improvisation as the basis of personal creativity using Spanish flamenco dance as an example // Man and Culture. 2019. no. 1. pp. 32-40.

Nikitin V.Yu. The Choreographer’s Mastery in Contemporary Dance: A Study Guide. 3rd ed., stereotyped. St. Petersburg: Planeta Muzyki, 2017. 520 pp.

Russu N.V. Subject-object foundations of improvisation as a type of creative activity in choreography: dissertation ... Candidate of Philosophical Sciences. Kemerovo, 2006. 223 pp.

Sachkov I.S. Ethical aspects of interaction as a methodological basis for partnering in contemporary dance // Bulletin of the Vaganova Ballet Academy. 2021. no. 4 (75). pp. 46-58.

Filanovskaya T.A. Dynamics of choreographic education in the artistic culture of Russia of the XVIII-XX centuries: dissertation ... Doctor of Cultural Studies: 24.00.01. St. Petersburg, 2011. 390 pp.

Sheregova V.A., Baklanova O.A., Galimova K.T. Problems and methods of developing improvisation in contemporary dance // Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2021. no. 1-1(82). pp. 4-8.

Blom L.A., Chaplin L.T. The Intimate act of choreography. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1982. 256 p.

Butterworth J. Teaching choreography in higher education: a process continuum model // Research in Dance Education. 2004. vol. 5. no. 1. pp. 45-67.

Hämäläinen S. Evaluation in choreographic pedagogy // Research in Dance Education. 2002. vol. 3. no. 1. pp. 35-45.

Laban R. The mastery of movement. 4th ed., rev. and enl. by L. Ullmann. London: Macdonald and Evans, 1980. 196 p.

Lavender L. Dancers talking dance: critical evaluation in the choreography class. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, 1996. 160 p.

Novack C.J. Sharing the dance: contact improvisation and American culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990. 258 p.

Smith-Autard J.M. Dance composition: a practical guide to creative success in dance making. 6th ed. London: Methuen Drama; A and C Black, 2010. 256 p.

Urmston E., Hewison J. Risk and flow in contact improvisation: pleasure, play and presence // Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices. 2014. Vol. 6. no. 2. pp. 219-232.

Issue

Section

APPLIED RESEARCH

Metrics

0 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article