The interpenetration of natural processes, social structures and state institutions is revealed in the present study through the prism of an interdisciplinary synthesis of the achievements of modern natural science and the domestic philosophical tradition, demonstrating the unity of the indicated spheres as a fundamental characteristic of self-organizing reality. The synergetic principles of nonlinear dynamics, emergence, bifurcation, coevolution and fractality that characterize the behavior of complex adaptive systems at the physical, biological and social levels are projected onto the analysis of state phenomena, revealing a structural isomorphism between the categorical apparatus of the natural and socio-humanitarian sciences, which is confirmed by high correlation coefficients, particularly pronounced with respect to coevolution and bifurcation transitions in historical development. The Russian intellectual tradition, encompassing the noosphere concept, the ideas of Russian cosmism, the theory of ethnogenesis and the Eurasian doctrine of mestorazvitie, serves as an organic bridge that permits conceptualization of the state not as an artificial construct opposed to nature but as an emergent level of organization arising in the process of the joint evolution of human community and the biosphere under the specific geographical and climatic conditions of the vast Eurasian space. Analysis of educational practices in higher education reveals significant disciplinary fragmentation between courses oriented toward the formation of a natural-scientific worldview and disciplines that disclose the civilizational and institutional foundations of Russian statehood. This fragmentation manifests in low indices of thematic intersection across most substantive blocks, with the exception of ecological and sustainable-development issues. Expert assessments indicate a substantial unrealized potential for interdisciplinary integration capable of increasing the formation of key competencies in systems analysis, ecological responsibility and understanding of the natural determinants of civilizational development by tens of percent. Such synthesis corresponds to the profound intentions of Russian thought, oriented toward all-unity and sobornost, and acquires particular relevance amid global challenges associated with the need to harmonize technological development, biosphere preservation and the strengthening of social-institutional resilience. The approach presented here opens prospects for overcoming the fragmentation of scientific knowledge and contributes to the formation of an integral worldview in which nature, society and the state are perceived as interconnected aspects of a single dynamic system. This has decisive significance for pedagogical theory, state policy and the formation of civic identity in the contemporary world.