<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://emreview.ru/lib/pkp/xml/oai2.xsl" ?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/
		http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
	<responseDate>2026-08-07T22:48:02Z</responseDate>
	<request identifier="oai:emreview.ru:article/1813" metadataPrefix="jats" verb="GetRecord">https://emreview.ru/index.php/emr/oai</request>
	<GetRecord>
		<record>
			<header>
				<identifier>oai:emreview.ru:article/1813</identifier>
				<datestamp>2025-02-19T14:45:41Z</datestamp>
				<setSpec>emr:%D0%9F%D0%A3%D0%9E</setSpec>
				<setSpec>driver</setSpec>
			</header>
			<metadata>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/" xml:lang="ru" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="eps-0.1">
			<front>
			<journal-meta>
				<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">emr</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="ojs">emr</journal-id>
				<journal-title-group>
			<journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управление образованием: теория и практика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Education Management Review</trans-title></trans-title-group>
</journal-title-group>			<issn pub-type="epub">2311-2174</issn>			<self-uri xlink:href="https://emreview.ru/index.php/emr"/>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1813</article-id>
			<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PROFESSIONALIZATION OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПРОФЕССИОНАЛИЗАЦИЯ УПРАВЛЕНЧЕСКОГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
			<title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Стилистические приемы в современной англоязычной литературе: восприятие метафор студентами лингвистических специальностей</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Stylistic techniques in modern English-language literature: perception of metaphors by students of linguistic specialties</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group>
			<contrib-group content-type="author">
				<contrib>
					<name-alternatives>
						<name name-style="western" specific-use="primary">
							<surname>Газимаева</surname>
							<given-names>Хава Абуязидовна</given-names>
						</name>
					</name-alternatives>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
					<email>Gazimaeva@chespu.ru</email>
				</contrib>
				<contrib>
					<name-alternatives>
						<name name-style="western" specific-use="primary">
							<surname>Мурадова</surname>
							<given-names>Асет Каменовна</given-names>
						</name>
					</name-alternatives>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/>
					<email>kamenovna@chespu.ru</email>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff-1"><institution content-type="orgname">Чеченский государственный университет им. А.А. Кадырова </institution></aff>
			<aff id="aff-2"><institution content-type="orgname">Чеченский государственный педагогический университет </institution></aff>
			<pub-date date-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="epub"><day>30</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
				<volume seq="3">14</volume><issue>9-2</issue><issue-id>90</issue-id><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Управление образованием: теория и практика</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="en">Education Management Review</issue-title><fpage>29</fpage>
				<lpage>37</lpage>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2025 </copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
				<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0">
					<license-p>Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			
			<self-uri xlink:href="https://emreview.ru/index.php/emr/article/view/1813/1495" content-type="application/pdf"/><self-uri xlink:href="https://emreview.ru/index.php/emr/article/view/1813"/>
			
			<abstract><p>Статья посвящена исследованию восприятия метафор в современной англоязычной литературе студентами лингвистических направлений. Цель работы – выявить особенности интерпретации и оценки метафорических выражений в зависимости от уровня языковой компетенции и литературоведческой подготовки респондентов. Методология включает лингвостилистический анализ текстов, психолингвистический эксперимент (семантическое шкалирование), статистическую обработку данных. Эмпирическую базу составили результаты опроса 120 студентов российских вузов. Установлено, что интерпретация метафор определяется взаимодействием лингвистических и экстралингвистических факторов. Выявлены значимые различия в восприятии метафор между студентами начальных и старших курсов. Зафиксирована положительная корреляция между уровнем литературоведческой подготовки и способностью распознавать неочевидные метафорические связи. Результаты исследования вносят вклад в теорию и практику лингвистического образования, открывают перспективы для оптимизации преподавания стилистики и интерпретации текста. Намечены векторы дальнейших междисциплинарных изысканий на стыке лингвистики, литературоведения и педагогики.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the study of the perception of metaphors in modern English-language literature by students of linguistic disciplines. The purpose of the work is to identify the peculiarities of interpretation and evaluation of metaphorical expressions depending on the level of linguistic competence and literary training of respondents. The methodology includes linguistic analysis of texts, psycholinguistic experiment (semantic scaling), statistical data processing. The empirical basis was based on the results of a survey of 120 Russian university students. It is established that the interpretation of metaphors is determined by the interaction of linguistic and extralinguistic factors. Significant differences in the perception of metaphors between elementary and senior students are revealed. There is a positive correlation between the level of literary training and the ability to recognize non-obvious metaphorical connections. The results of the research contribute to the theory and practice of linguistic education, and open up prospects for optimizing the teaching of stylistics and text interpretation. The vectors of further interdisciplinary research at the intersection of linguistics, literary studies and pedagogy are outlined.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><title>Ключевые слова</title><kwd>метафора</kwd><kwd>стилистические приемы</kwd><kwd>интерпретация</kwd><kwd>восприятие</kwd><kwd>англоязычная литература</kwd><kwd>лингвистическое образование</kwd><kwd>междисциплинарный подход</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title><kwd>metaphor</kwd><kwd>stylistic techniques</kwd><kwd>interpretation</kwd><kwd>perception</kwd><kwd>English-language literature</kwd><kwd>linguistic education</kwd><kwd>interdisciplinary approach</kwd></kwd-group><counts><page-count count="9"/></counts>
		<custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-cover</meta-name><meta-value><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://emreview.ru/public/journals/1/cover_issue_90_ru_RU.jpg"/></meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta>
	</front>
	<body><p/></body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<ref id="R1"><mixed-citation>Boers F. Cognitive semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases: An assessment // Review of cognitive linguistics. 2011. № 9(1). рр. 227-261.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R2"><mixed-citation>Boers F. Expanding learners' vocabulary through metaphor awareness: What expansion, what learners, what vocabulary // Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching, 2004. pp. 211-232.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R3"><mixed-citation>Deignan A., Littlemore J., Semino E. Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 341 p.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R4"><mixed-citation>Doiz A., Elizari C. Metaphoric competence and the acquisition of figurative vocabularyin foreign language learning // Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada, 2013. № 13. рр. 47-82.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R5"><mixed-citation>Gibbs Jr.R.W. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 566 p.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R6"><mixed-citation>Glucksberg S. How metaphors create categories-quickly // The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. 2008. pp. 67-83.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R7"><mixed-citation>Kövecses Z. Conceptual metaphor theory // The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. 2016. pp. 13-27.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R8"><mixed-citation>Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago press, 2008. 256 р.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R9"><mixed-citation>Littlemore J. Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Cham: Springer, 2009. 212 p.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R10"><mixed-citation>Littlemore J., Chen P., Barnden J., Koester A. Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English // Applied linguistics. 2011. № 32(4). рр. 408-429.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R11"><mixed-citation>Littlemore J., Low G. Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability // Applied linguistics. 2006. № 27(2). рр. 268-294.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R12"><mixed-citation>MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse // Pragglejaz Group. Metaphor and symbol. 2007. № 22(1). рр. 1-39.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R13"><mixed-citation>Nacey S. Metaphors in learner English. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2013. 290 p.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R14"><mixed-citation>Semino E. Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
			<ref id="R15"><mixed-citation>Steen G.J., Dorst A.G., Herrmann J.B., Kaal A., Krennmayr T., Pasma T. A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Vol. 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>			</metadata>
		</record>
	</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
